Bard even has a helpful "Google It" button if you want more information on a given subject. However, between the two, Google Bard sometimes does include links to where it obtained information from with its answers, while ChatGPT does not. Neither Google Bard nor ChatGPT are as good as Bing Chat at providing sources with their responses. Similar results occurred when I asked the two to write poetry ChatGPT once more came out as a much more flowery writer. ![]() Google Bard's response felt robotic in comparison, and it wrote a cautionary tale about being too curious. ![]() Speaking of musings, when asking both chatbots about ideas for a novel starring a roaming space octopus, ChatGPTs proved to have a much better way with words and tended to produce happier content. However, Google Bard didn't engage in the abstract discussion at all and simply explained how the egg came first - although it did cite a Wikipedia article on the subject, while ChatGPT didn't cite anything at all (more on that later). When I asked both, "what came first the chicken or the egg?" ChatGPT acknowledged the intellectual discussion around the topic while also pointing out that scientifically it's believed that eggs appeared before chickens. However, Google Bard doesn't seem to understand these differences and instead responds like an eager child excited to spit out facts it knows. ChatGPT usually can tell if questions posed are meant to be philosophical or empirical and will provide both factual answers backed by science as well as common musings on a subject.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |